A General Family of Preferential Belief Removal Operators
نویسندگان
چکیده
Most belief change operators in the AGM tradition assume an underlying plausibility ordering over the possible worlds which is transitive and complete. A unifying structure for these operators, based on supplementing the plausibility ordering with a second, guiding, relation over the worlds was presented in [Booth et al., 2004]. However it is not always reasonable to assume completeness of the underlying ordering. In this paper we generalise the structure of [Booth et al., 2004] to allow incomparabilities between worlds. We axiomatise the resulting class of belief removal functions, and show that it includes an important family of removal functions based on finite prioritised belief bases. We also look at some alternative notions of epistemic entrenchment which become distinguishable once we allow incomparabilities.
منابع مشابه
Belief Change in a Preferential Non-monotonic Framework
Belief change and non-monotonic reasoning are usually viewed as two sides of the same coin, with results showing that one can formally be defined in terms of the other. In this paper we show that we can also integrate the two formalisms by studying belief change within a (preferential) non-monotonic framework. This integration relies heavily on the identification of the monotonic core of a non-...
متن کاملUsing Defeasible Information to Obtain Coherence
We consider the problem of obtaining coherence in a propositional knowledge base using techniques from Belief Change. Our motivation comes from the field of formal ontologies where coherence is interpreted to mean that a concept name has to be satisfiable. In the propositional case we consider here, this translates to a propositional formula being satisfiable. We define belief change operators ...
متن کاملRelaxation-based revision operators in description logics
As ontologies and description logics (DLs) reach out to a broader audience, several reasoning services are developed in this context. Belief revision is one of them, of prime importance when knowledge is prone to change and inconsistency. In this paper we address both the generalization of the well-known AGM postulates, and the definition of concrete and well-founded revision operators in diffe...
متن کاملA Preferential Semantics for Epistemic Logic
The development of agent communication languages casts a spotlight on epistemic logic and the enrichment of epistemic languages by additional operators, e.g. deontic operators or operators representing speech acts. In this paper we focus on two limitations of classical epistemic logic. The standard possible worlds semantics allows one to model either the knowledge or the beliefs of an agent, bu...
متن کاملStrong convergence theorem for finite family of m-accretive operators in Banach spaces
The purpose of this paper is to propose a compositeiterative scheme for approximating a common solution for a finitefamily of m-accretive operators in a strictly convex Banach spacehaving a uniformly Gateaux differentiable norm. As a consequence,the strong convergence of the scheme for a common fixed point ofa finite family of pseudocontractive mappings is also obtained.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Philosophical Logic
دوره 41 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009